What Are the Pros and Cons of The Timegrapher 1000 Vs Timegrapher 1900?

The Timegrapher 1000 and Timegrapher 1900 are both popular devices used in watchmaking and horology for timing and regulating mechanical watches. Each has its own set of features and capabilities, along with pros and cons. Here’s a comparison of the two:

Timegrapher 1000:


  1. Affordability: The Timegrapher 1000 is often more budget-friendly than the Timegrapher 1900, making it a suitable choice for hobbyists and enthusiasts.
  2. Basic Functionality: It provides essential timing functions, including rate measurement (beat error and amplitude), which are sufficient for basic watch regulation.
  3. Portability: The Timegrapher 1000 is relatively compact and portable, making it easy to transport or move around a workspace.
  4. User-Friendly: It is generally straightforward to use, with a user-friendly interface that allows you to quickly measure and adjust the accuracy of a watch.


  1. Limited Features: The Timegrapher 1000 lacks some advanced features found in the Timegrapher 1900, such as the ability to measure the lift angle.
  2. Less Precision: While it provides accurate enough measurements for basic regulation, it may not offer the same level of precision and sensitivity as the Timegrapher 1900.
  3. Limited Compatibility: It may have limited compatibility with certain watches, especially those with unique escapements or complex movements.

Timegrapher 1900:


  1. Advanced Features: The Timegrapher 1900 offers advanced features, including lift angle measurement, which provides a more comprehensive view of a watch’s performance.
  2. Higher Precision: It often provides more precise and detailed measurements, making it suitable for professional watchmakers and those working with high-end watches.
  3. Compatibility: The Timegrapher 1900 is designed to be compatible with a broader range of watches, including complex and high-beat movements.
  4. Data Storage: Some models of the Timegrapher 1900 come with data storage capabilities, allowing you to save and analyze multiple measurements over time.


  1. Cost: The Timegrapher 1900 is generally more expensive than the Timegrapher 1000, which may not be suitable for those on a tight budget.
  2. Complexity: It may have a steeper learning curve due to its advanced features and capabilities, making it more suitable for experienced users.
  3. Size and Portability: The Timegrapher 1900 is often larger and less portable than the Timegrapher 1000, which can be a drawback if you need to move it frequently.

In summary, the choice between the Timegrapher 1000 and Timegrapher 1900 depends on your specific needs and budget. The Timegrapher 1000 is a cost-effective option for basic watch regulation and timing tasks, while the Timegrapher 1900 offers advanced features and higher precision, making it suitable for professional watchmakers and those working with a wide range of watches. Consider your skill level and the complexity of the watches you’ll be working on when making your decision.

How Do I Assess If It’s Worth the Extra Cost for The Timegrapher 1900?

Assessing whether it’s worth the extra cost for the Timegrapher 1900 over the Timegrapher 1000 depends on your specific needs and requirements. Here are some factors to consider when making this decision:

  1. Type of Watches You Work With:
    • If you primarily work with high-end or complex watches, especially those with unusual escapements or high-beat movements, the advanced features and precision of the Timegrapher 1900 may be more beneficial.
  2. Skill Level:
    • Your experience and skill level in watchmaking or watch regulation play a significant role. The Timegrapher 1900 may be more suitable for experienced watchmakers who can make the most of its advanced capabilities.
  3. Budget:
    • Consider your budget and whether the extra cost of the Timegrapher 1900 aligns with your financial resources. If you are on a tight budget or are a hobbyist, the Timegrapher 1000 may suffice.
  4. Frequency of Use:
    • How often you plan to use the timegrapher is a crucial factor. If you perform watch regulation frequently and rely on precise measurements, the Timegrapher 1900’s advanced features may justify the cost.
  5. Long-Term Goals:
    • Consider your long-term goals and whether you foresee expanding your watchmaking skills or working on a broader range of watches in the future. The Timegrapher 1900 can offer more versatility and compatibility.
  6. Specific Features:
    • Evaluate the specific features of the Timegrapher 1900 that you find valuable. If features like lift angle measurement, advanced data storage, or compatibility with a wide range of watches are essential to your work, it may be worth the investment.
  7. Professional vs. Hobbyist:
    • Are you a professional watchmaker or technician, or are you a hobbyist? Professionals may find the Timegrapher 1900’s precision and capabilities more critical for their work, while hobbyists might find the Timegrapher 1000 sufficient.
  8. Learning Curve:
    • Consider the learning curve associated with the Timegrapher 1900’s advanced features. If you are new to watchmaking, be prepared to invest time in learning how to use it effectively.
  9. Return on Investment:
    • If you are using the timegrapher for commercial purposes, evaluate whether the improved accuracy and capabilities of the Timegrapher 1900 will lead to increased customer satisfaction and business growth.
  10. Brand and Model:
    • Research and compare different models of both the Timegrapher 1000 and Timegrapher 1900. Some variations within these models may offer a better balance of features and cost.

To make an informed decision, it may be helpful to read reviews, seek recommendations from experienced watchmakers, and, if possible, try out both models to see which one aligns better with your needs and preferences. Ultimately, the choice between the Timegrapher 1000 and Timegrapher 1900 should be based on your specific circumstances and objectives in the world of watchmaking or watch repair.